Questions to contribution at ICHEP 2010 (13min talk only)
---------------------------------------------------------

Q (T.B.): What about the interesting  eta' \pi channel, and f_1\pi  channels
A: We checked our feasibility for all these different decay channels, and
indeed, even though nothing yet released (ongoing optimisation of our Ecal
reconstruction to fully take advantage of the hardware upgrades done for the
hadron runs) we have excellent resolution and significantly higher statistics 
as compared to previous experiments. We will have results on those channels 
soon as well. 


Q (V.B.): Did you study systematics of the phase motion using MC?
A: We did lots of MC studies concerning systematics. These studies were 
particularly focussed on background from so-called Deck effect. Anyhow our 
exotic signal stays stable even when de-/increasing the waveset fitted to our 
data, including the phase motion. The phase motion itself is - as you can see 
for the example shown here - rather clean, and this is just how it comes out. 
And once more, the black data points represent the 1step PWA (wo any resonance
assumed to be present at his level), whereas the red line represents the mass-
dependent fit of all 6 main waves, parameterised by Breit-Wigners, and 
simulataneously fitted to the data.  


Q(L.L.): Concerning your studies of KKbar, how good is your resolution of the 
         f_0(980)?
A: Indeed this is a good point since the f_0 is indeed at the threshold. 
We have not yet released fits yet, so cannot tell you our final resolution.
Anyhow, it is clear that we will need to use some Flatte parameterisation, if 
you have something in mind you would like to propose to us, let us know. 
(Indeed he worked something out and proposes to use his paramterisations :o)