\subsection{Strange quark distribution function and quark fragmentation functions} \label{subsec:physics.unpol.sect1} Hadron multiplicities can be measured at \compass\ for a large variety of produced hadrons, $\pi^+$, $\pi^-$, $\pi^0$, $K^+$, $K^-$, $K^0$, $\Lambda$ and $\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $x$, $z$ and $Q^2$. Hadron multiplicities represent the number of hadrons of type $h$ produced per DIS event. At LO, they can be written as \begin{equation} {\frac{\di N^{h}(x,z,Q^2)}{\di N^{DIS}}}= \frac{\sum_q e_{q}^2 q(x,Q^2) D_q^h(z,Q^2)} {\sum_q e_{q}^2 q(x,Q^2)}, \label{unpol_mul} \end{equation} where $q(x,Q^2)$ is the unpolarised PDF for flavour $q$, $D_q^h$ is the FF for a quark $q$ fragmenting into a hadron $h$, and $z$ is the fraction of virtual photon energy carried by the hadron. The multiplicities involve a product of PDFs and FFs. The possibility to disentangle them bases on factorisation, %%%~\cite{} add some Collins Ref here later \ie, PDFs depend only on $x$ and FFs only on $z$. %Hadron multiplicities can be measured at \compass\ for a large variety of %produced hadrons, $\pi^+, \pi^-, \pi^0, K^+, K^-, K^0, \Lambda$ and %$\bar{\Lambda}$, as a function of $x, z$ and $Q^2$. An extensive and precise mapping of hadron multiplicities will be achieved for values of $x$ as low as 0.004, \ie, to a value ten times smaller than the lower $x$ limit of \hermes\ which performed the only other SIDIS measurement. The data will be taken at higher average values of $Q^2$ or $W$, which are a signature of the current fragmentation region. The particle identification by the RICH detector and by electromagnetic calorimeters will make it possible to identify various channels so that also the strange quark sector will be covered, for example $K^+, K^-$ and $K^0$. The data will provide input to global analyses of FFs such as the one by DSS\cite{deFlorian:2007aj}. The advantage of SIDIS data is that they are sensitive to individual quark and antiquark flavours in the fragmentation process, which is not the case for $e^+e^-$ annihilation data. In addition, the new data will be used on their own in a simple LO analysis to extract for instance $s(x)+\bar s(x)$ and some poorly known FFs, as described below. \begin{figure}[tbp] \centering %\includegraphics[height=8cm,width=15cm,angle=90]{proj_s.pdf} \includegraphics[width=0.8\hsize]{unpol_strange+frag_proj_s} \caption{Projected statistical errors for $s(x) + \bar{s}(x)$ for one week of data taking with a 2.5~m long liquid hydrogen target. Systematic errors are estimated to be of the order of 25\% of the value of $s$. Also shown are the MSTW and CTEQ parameterisations at LO and the \hermes\ result.} \label{unpol:s_compass} \end{figure} \subsubsection{Strange quark distribution function} While light quark PDFs are well constrained, this is not the case for the strange quark and antiquark distribution functions $s(x)$ and $\bar s(x)$, especially in the \compass\ $x$ range. A better knowledge of $s(x)$ is needed for the extraction of $\Delta s$ from the measured quantity $\Delta s(x)/s(x)$ and for physics issues relevant to LHC experiments. Our present knowledge of PDFs comes from global analyses at NNLO (see Refs.~\cite{Martin:2009iq,Nadolsky:2008zw} and references therein) of inclusive data on hard scattering from fixed-target experiments and the \hera\ and Tevatron colliders. No semi-inclusive data are included in these analyses yet. The lack of knowledge on $s(x)$ was reflected in the common practise of past PDF analyses to adopt the simplifying ansatz of $s+\bar s$ being proportional to $\bar u+\bar d$. Only recently, PDF analyses started to treat $s$ and $\bar{s}$ separately including recent dimuon cross section data from NuTeV, which are sensitive to $s$. %%% ~\cite{} add a Ref here later \hermes~\cite{Airapetian:2008qf} determined $s(x)+\bar s(x)$ using SIDIS kaon data on a deuteron target and a simplified formula for the multiplicities at LO. The results disagree substantially with existing parameterisations. At $x=0.03$, the \hermes\ value is twice higher than the CTEQ6L one and at $x=0.1$ it is close to zero, much below the CTEQ6L value (Fig.~\ref{unpol:s_compass}). \compass\ has taken similar data using the $^6$LiD target covering the range $0.004